Why Us Did Not Send Man to Moon Again
The Existent Reasons Why Humans Can't Go To The Moon Again
5 mind-blown arguments betwixt rumors and facts and what is the back side of the moon.
On July xx, 1969, Armstrong, the commander of Apollo 11, stepped off the astronauts and onto the moon. It was the offset time that a human had always fix pes on the moon. More than than 50 years later, it should not be difficult to land on the moon again with today's engineering. Afterward all, the moon has been landed then many years ago. Only it is strange that after these years, humans have never been to the moon once more.
At that fourth dimension, the United states and the Soviet Spousal relationship were competing for space evolution, competing to meet who would go to the moon first. So in such a tense competitive environment, who lied is possible. But if it is true that the U.s. lied, the lie is as well big, so large that it deceived the world, in other words, deceived the entire human being race.
At that fourth dimension, the U.Southward. moon landing was broadcast live effectually the globe. Information technology is said that the viewership in the United States reached 94% [one]. Basically, there were telly sets, the screen was alive at the time of the spectacle. But in the whole moon landing process there was a strange affair, that is, in the eye of the live circulate, the signal was interrupted for two minutes. These two minutes get a hot topic of discussion. What happened in these two minutes?
The moon landing hoax conspiracy theory
- In fact, as early on as 1974, at that place were people who suspected that the U.S. moon landing was a hoax. At that place was a famous book called "Nosotros Never Went To The Moon", written past Bill Kaysing & Randy Reid. Some say that the whole process of the U.S. moon landing was filmed in advance in the studio. But in the alive broadcast of the footage already prepared. It was besides rumored the live broadcast directed by Stanley Kubrick, a very famous American manager at the time. Stanley Kubrick later released a Capricorn One in 1978. The plot was about humans preparing to land on Mars. Just it failed. So people filmed a false landing on Mars in the studio. And and then deceive the earth of the film. Many people believe that this film is Stanley Kubrick's confession[ii].
ii. The flying American flag[iii]: the above can merely be described as suspicion, simply in fact, people who suspect the moon landing is a hoax have found a lot of evidence. At the fourth dimension of the moon landing, an American flag was planted. This American flag looked like information technology was flying in the air current. Some people say this is impossible because there is no air on the surface of the moon. At that place is no wind, and how can it exist flown in the air current? NASA has an explanation for this: there is no wind on the surface of the moon. Just the flag is supported by a vertical stick and a horizontal stick. When the flag is inserted on the ground of the moon, it has to drill down. This is a shaking phenomenon. So it seems to exist floating. Plus no air resistance, the shaking time will be longer.
iii. At that place are multiple lite sources in the photograph: it is reasonable to take pictures of the moon with merely a big calorie-free source of the dominicus. But the moon photos bear witness that the astronaut'southward mask reflects out some other light sources. Make people feel like in the studio. NASA said in that location is really only ane large light source the sun. Merely in that location is a lot of equipment around the scene. There is a landing spacecraft itself will reverberate some lite. And the astronauts' suits themselves have calorie-free sources. Then overall, there are many light sources.
4. No stars in the sky[iv]: information technology is reasonable to say that there is no air and no cloud on the moon. The heaven should be full of stars. NASA explained that the sun shines on the surface of the moon is likewise vivid. Like we cannot come across the stars during the day. If it is at night on the moon, we can even so see the stars. It's but that we're landing in the daytime.
5. Moon rocks are the same as on earth: The moon landing program brought back some rocks from the moon. After NASA analyzed the rocks, they said that the rocks on the moon and the world do not seem to be different. And then many people have doubts nigh this. How tin something on the moon be like to something on earth? Or have they never been in that location at all? NASA did not explain more, perhaps NASA actually cannot effigy out how to explain it. Or maybe the real thing can't exist explained furthermore.
NASA faced the moon landing hoax with citing a number of hard evidences. The astronauts put a retro-reflector on the moon[5], which is used to accurately measure the distance between the moon and the earth. A light amplification by stimulated emission of radiation is sent from the earth and reflected back from the moon, so NASA tin probably measure the distance. NASA launches a lunar observation orbiter. This vehicle was photographed in 2011 flying around the moon at ultra-low altitude. In those photos you can clearly run across some of the tire tracks where the lunar rover ran. Fifty-fifty the flags that were planted, and the footprints that were stepped on. Since at that place is no wind on the moon, it will not atmospheric condition, so after years, the marks are still the same.
In fact, the United States landed on the moon non but this time. A full of six moon landings. Simply most people have a deeper impression of the first time. The U.S. Apollo programme launched a total of 7 moon landings. №11, №12, №14, №15, №16 and №17 all landed successfully, except for №13 when the oxygen tank of a sudden exploded and returned to earth in an emergency. The first moon landing was but a landing, stepping on footprints and planting the flag. Later, the moon landing even drove on the moon, and nerveless a lot of rocks back to globe.
The two minutes of live broadcast interruption
The video indicate was sent from the Moon to Australia, then from Australia to the U.s.a., and then to the worldwide national television stations. At that fourth dimension many radio enthusiasts took their own equipment to eavesdrop on the betoken. Some intercepted a betoken that was not alive, and Armstrong all of a sudden said: "What? What is it?" So the ground station replied:" What happen? What do you see?" Armstrong said: "So large! Incredible!" Maurice Chatelain, the footing operator at the time, afterwards testified that Armstrong had indeed switched the signal to the medical channel. However, medical channels are unremarkably used for communication betwixt astronauts and ground doctors. It is usually used for personal privacy problems. Was Armstrong, who suddenly switched to the medical channel and said the above conversation?
In fact, when Apollo 11 was flying to the moon, Armstrong and Aldrin had already witnessed an unidentified flight object. They saw an unidentified object following their spacecraft. They likewise immediately reported it to the ground control center. They also had a suspicion that it was a rocket thruster that had been cut off earlier. When further inquiry was done, there was no longer anything post-obit the spacecraft.
Information technology was later discovered that Apollo 11 did not country where it was supposed to. The ship landed in a place very far away from their original landing site. So people came to ii inferences. The commencement possibility is: did they see the UFO and go after it, and then they went off course? The second possibility is: when they were well-nigh to land all of a sudden found the original landing site problems and acquired them not to land. So temporarily alter the landing site. This change caused their fuel most all depleted. Almost did not have enough fuel to return to globe.
The dorsum side of the moon
In fact, two years earlier the Apollo 11 moon landing, NASA sent five small craft to orbit the moon. They were also looking for the best identify to state. This fourth dimension, they too took a lot of images of the back of the moon. These images are a national secret, so before sending the data to NASA, it was first sent to a hush-hush research laboratory of the U.South. National Security Agency. At the fourth dimension, an musical instrument mechanic named Karl Wolf had access to this inquiry lab. He said he saw a few photos that he would never forget. He said many of the photos were taken on the back side of the moon covered with buildings. There are towers and bases and and then on. But Karl Wolf's words, many people exercise non believe. Afterwards, the famous super-powered person Ingo Swann's remote viewing confirmed Karl Wolf'due south merits. And Ingo Swann'south powers were certified past the U.S. CIA. The U.South. National Security Agency (NSA) afterward invited Ingo Swann to encounter the dorsum side of the moon past remote viewing[vi]. Ingo Swann saw the same buildings as described by Karl Wolf. Halfway through his remote viewing, Ingo Swann said that he saw something inside the buildings and saw him looking at them remotely. The NSA immediately stopped his remote viewing operation.
Afterward all this, why, afterward and then many years, have humans non gone to the moon once more? With today's technology, going to the moon should exist a unproblematic thing. Even if the research has been developed, at present travel to the moon is possible. The U.S. government has actually responded by proverb that it is not that they exercise non want to go to the moon again, but that the moon landing programme is also expensive. The Apollo programme toll $126 billion. In add-on to being too expensive. The moon landing applied science had been destroyed. That's what Donald Pettit, an astronaut said. Donald Pettit expressed he would like to go to the moon again. Unfortunately, the U.s. does not take this engineering[7].
Do yous believe those men have landed on the moon?
References:
[1] https://world wide web.bbc.com/news/globe-us-canada-48857752
[2] https://indianexpress.com/article/entertainment/hollywood/did-stanley-kubrick-confess-his-involvement-in-fake-moon-landing-with-the-shining-5972360/
[iii] https://www.forbes.com/sites/kionasmith/2019/07/20/how-apollo-11-raised-the-flag-on-the-moon-and-what-it-means-today/?sh=4dcab54e6f9e
[iv] https://www.discovery.com/science/apollo-50th-ceremony/why-aren-t-at that place-stars-in-the-moon-landing-photos-
[5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_retroreflectors_on_the_Moon
[half-dozen] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ingo_Swann
[7] https://flatearth.ws/technology
Source: https://medium.com/storytellings/the-real-reasons-why-humans-cant-go-to-the-moon-again-23c0d834e4a1
0 Response to "Why Us Did Not Send Man to Moon Again"
Post a Comment